From the beginning of modern art, there’s been much
versatility in the world we live in. Most of everything is digitally empowered.
Digital art is an art form itself and is the result of advancing technology in
our world. Two modern artists that work directly with technology are Liu Dao
and Alexa Wright. The two are similar in intention and movement, but also
distinct from each other through the messages they send and how they portray
their messages to an audience.
Liu Dao
is a group of artist who originated in Shanghai. The name is derived from the
pinyin language, meaning Island 6. Before meeting to for this group, they were
all on their own paths in the art industry. All of which are technicians. They
first started as painters, sculptors, photographers, filmmakers, digital
imaging artists, dancers and writers. The mix of culture and variety in this
group makes the artwork more solid and stronger in appearance. The choice of
medium is cultivating, as they tend to use LED lights. Liu Dao specializes in
interactive art and they usually place their artwork in box frames, whether it is
wood, metal, or any other material. The box gives much significance to
preservation and gives the artwork a different effect. Most of the artwork done
is of humorousness or political views of events going on in Asia. Two examples
of their interactive art are called “Vigilance” and “An Oriental Arabesque”.
"An Oriental Arabesque" |
Similarities/Differences
These two artists or groups of
artists are both digitally aesthetic. Their use of technology speaks to their
audience. From what we’ve read in class, these two groups try to experiment
with tactical media as they incorporate politics and humanity into their
artwork. Island 6 is successful in attracting attention to general and serious
issues, but they aren’t so strong with politics. Alexa plays more with
humanity, but she’s tied in serious matters with previous works she’s displayed
internationally. Both are successful in conveying the serious issue going on in
their community, but the question arises as “Do they move their audience and
try to convince them in taking action in their communities?”
Even though similar, the two become
different from each other in the approach they take as artists. Alexa Wright definitely
approaches her audience head on to create immediate reactions such as her
project she called “The Conversation piece.” In this piece she doesn’t appear
in the background and she lets others come to it and speak to it. The piece
itself speaks back and it corresponds directly with what you’re saying so this
isn’t a programmed microphone that’s fixed to speak un-accordingly. Her
attempts at contact never seem to fail.
As for Island 6, they take a more
visual than interactive approach. They do design their pieces to move, but not
so much to get an immediate reaction from the audience. I definitely feel that
they will be blown up if they had done it for an immediate response. Their
signature creations do still keep their fans following and I really admire
that. They don’t stray too far to lose themselves in the art world.
Contacting My Artists
Sources
- Wright. Alexa Wright. n.p. n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.
- Wright. Alexa Wright. Rhizome, n.d. Web. 11. Apr. 2013
- Stalbaum. Alexa Wright and Alf Finney, Alter EGO, At FILE 2007. Youtube. n.p, 1 Sept. 2007. 10 Apr. 2013
- "Liu Dao". Wikipedia. n.p., 17 Mar. 2013. Web. 10 Apr. 2013
- "Island6 Art Collective". Island6 Home of the Island6 Art Collective.Thomas Charvériat, Peter Bradt. 2011. FoldPress Publications. Web. 11 Apr. 2013
-
No comments:
Post a Comment